-- RunaBriguglio - 14 Sep 2012HP 4.875-1.2254.65866450

Test new KL basis

/towerdata/adsec_calib/M2C/KL_v13/klm2c50k.fits

Tracknum modes amp
20120914_025212 0-49  
20120914_025326 50-99 100
20120914_025435 100-149 80
20120914_025543 150-199 70
20120914_025655 200-249 50
20120914_025808 250-299 50
20120914_025917 300-349 40
20120914_030025 350-399 40
20120914_030132 400-449 30
20120914_030240 450-499 30
20120914_030346 500-549 30
20120914_030451 550-599 30
20120914_030557 600-649 30
['20120914_025212', '20120914_025326', '20120914_025435', '20120914_025543', '20120914_025655', '20120914_025808', '20120914_025917', '20120914_030025', '20120914_030132', '20120914_030240', '20120914_030346', '20120914_030451', '20120914_030557']

Comparison flat W vs 4D

to identify if high order load shape residuals could affects the loop stability

Changed sign of 4D images

this was verified by observing that hexalign() was giving siistematically wrong corrections, moving M2 out of the alignment position. keyword /NEGATIVE inserted in the code. hexalign now works.

!!

the 4D configuration was not changed. but we power cycled the system once.
Topic revision: r2 - 14 Sep 2012, RunaBriguglio
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback