# SX NCPA

04:54

Starting system up

05:42

0 Degrees

54.6 focal position 990 Hz Bin 1 Gains before GOPT 0.9 0.4 0.3

07:27

Mode 4: -30 Default = -30

Mode 5: -17.4 Default = -18

Mode 6: -20 Default = -6

Mode 7: 0 Default = 4

Mode 8: 8.5 Default = 13

Mode 9: 3 Default = 9

Mode 10: -16 Default = - 14

Mode 11: -13 Default = 0

08:18

60 Degrees

Mode 4: -15.7 Default = -12

Mode 5: 31 Default 0... (This was verified +/- 5nm by several iterations)

All following data taken with mode 5 of 31nm

Mode 6: 19.5, Default = 34

Mode 7: -5.1, Default = -8

Mode 8: 6.8, Default = 8

Mode 9: -16.1, Default = -15

Mode 10: 10, Default = 5

Mode 11: -4.5, Default = -5

09:42

Move to 120

Mode 4: 1, Default = 10

Mode 5: -40.8, Default = -40

Mode 6: -26.1, Default = -15

Mode 7: -11.5, Default = - 10

Mode 8: 1.5, default = 4

Mode 9: 11.1, default = 7

Mode 10: -12, default = -10

Mode 11: -13, default = -8

Data were taken such that only those data sets that showed a clear tendency in Strehl Ratio Vs changing coefficients were deemed acceptable. Many datasets would have a

sort of multi-peaked distribution. These were thrown out.

-- %USERSIG{GregoryTaylor - 2016-04-12}%